[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#611340: marked as done (unblock: proftpd-dfsg/1.3.3a-6)



Your message dated Sat, 29 Jan 2011 16:46:49 +0000
with message-id <1296319609.3206.2388.camel@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#611340: unblock: proftpd-dfsg/1.3.3a-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #611340,
regarding unblock: proftpd-dfsg/1.3.3a-6
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
611340: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=611340
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package proftpd-dfsg

  [SECURITY] 3536.dpatch fixes insufficient bounds checking in sql_prepare_where() 
  function as found in mod_sql.c.

unblock proftpd-dfsg/1.3.3a-6

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=it_IT.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=it_IT.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 10:49 +0100, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
> Please unblock package proftpd-dfsg
> 
>   [SECURITY] 3536.dpatch fixes insufficient bounds checking in sql_prepare_where() 
>   function as found in mod_sql.c.

I'm not entirely sure what the short tag / long tag logging stuff has to
do with the security update; it seems harmless but makes the diff noisy.

Unblocked.

Regards,

Adam



--- End Message ---

Reply to: