Bug#611064: marked as done (unblock: live-config/2.0.15-1)
Your message dated Fri, 28 Jan 2011 18:52:59 +0000
with message-id <1296240779.2542.95.camel@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#611064: unblock: live-config/2.0.15-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #611064,
regarding unblock: live-config/2.0.15-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
611064: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=611064
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
live-config (2.0.15-1) unstable; urgency=low
* Removing systemd support for 2.0 branch (Closes: #608326).
* Tightening grep call for live user in /etc/passwd to not fail with
false-positives.
* Removing headers in copyright file.
* Updating year in copyright.
* Updating year in manpage, examples and script files.
* Correcting hostname typo in manpages.
* Adding Italian manpage translation from skizzhg <skizzhg@gmx.com>.
-- Daniel Baumann <daniel@debian.org> Tue, 25 Jan 2011 08:16:12 +0100
--
Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: daniel.baumann@progress-technologies.net
Internet: http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Tue, 2011-01-25 at 09:00 +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> live-config (2.0.15-1) unstable; urgency=low
>
> * Removing systemd support for 2.0 branch (Closes: #608326).
The package in question appears to have only had a Suggests relationship
to systemd anyway, so that's arguably not even a bug to start with.
> * Tightening grep call for live user in /etc/passwd to not fail with
> false-positives.
That's a reasonable change, which I'd have considered unblocking on its
own.
> * Removing headers in copyright file.
> * Updating year in copyright.
> * Updating year in manpage, examples and script files.
and these seem mostly busy work afaics; updating copyright statements
when no changes have been made seems debatable in general, imho.
However, meh, unblocked. Given the timing, I'm not anticipating
unblocking it again.
Regards,
Adam
--- End Message ---
Reply to: