Hi there! > Cc:ing all the people that have interacted with this bug. Still true, but this is the last email about this subject from me. On Sun, 28 Nov 2010 17:47:41 +0100, Luca Capello wrote: > Some hints about the chef package in Debian: > > - Debian has (6-month-old) 0.8.16-4.1, while upstream is at 0.9.12 > - popcon show 41 installation (2 recent) for the chef binary package and > 2 (0 recent) for the chef-solr binary package > - there is an RC bug for chef-solr (#604231, installation fails because > of nodedown) > > Thus, I think the best thing would be to remove chef from squeeze (new > bugs created), so then we can remove solr as well. chef has been removed from squeeze because of #610127 and #596351: <http://packages.qa.debian.org/c/chef/news/20110121T163911Z.html> >>> It's also in lenny (albeit in contrib) so if it were removed then a >>> migration path for those users to a replacement would be good. > > Given that chef-solr was not in lenny, the above applies to solr only. > However, I should say that I do not know at all a good migration path. This concern still stands, but given that no one has shown interest in implementing this in mostly two months, I would say that we should simply remove solr from squeeze. For the Release Team: should I file an RM bug or this one is sufficient? Thx, bye, Gismo / Luca
Attachment:
pgpP3zVoNQH5M.pgp
Description: PGP signature