[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#608350: marked as done (unblock: gnash/0.8.8-8)



Your message dated Sun, 23 Jan 2011 21:49:01 +0100
with message-id <4D3C943D.80905@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#608350: unblock: gnash/0.8.8-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #608350,
regarding unblock: gnash/0.8.8-8
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
608350: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=608350
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock


Please unblock package gnash

Main reason to unblock it is that 0.8.8-7 makes it working on kfreebsd-*
systems too by disabling jemalloc (#604573). Thanks.

gnash (0.8.8-7)
   * Added patch 07_jemalloc to make kfreebsd-* archs treated like *bsd oses
     (Closes: #604573).
   * Transitional packages architecture from any to all (Closes: #603609).
   * Added patch to fix texinfo docs.
gnash (0.8.8-6)
   * Added patches that fix some upstream bugs
     + 01_38be50cecc, 02_b3d5da01fb, 03_c22769f0ab
     + 04_baseuri1, 05_baseuri2
     + 06_ytfix: youtube videos starts immediately.
   * Fixed browser-plugin-gnash piuparts error.

unblock gnash/0.8.8-7




--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 01/21/2011 12:46 AM, Gabriele Giacone wrote:
> 
> lintian is happy again and some fixes since 0.8.8-6 concern 
> documentation and translation. Maybe you'll also consider patch 
> against CVE-2010-4337.
> 

Only the fix for CVE-2010-4337 and 07_jemalloc seem interesting at this
stage of the freeze. I'd approve a tpu upload fixing only those issues,
if it's uploaded really soon. Otherwise, I'm also happy with leaving
gnash as is.

gnash/0.8.8-8 won't enter Squeeze I'm afraid.

Regards,

-- 
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/


--- End Message ---

Reply to: