[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#610126: marked as done (RM: chef/0.8.16-4.2)



Your message dated Thu, 20 Jan 2011 12:49:56 +0100
with message-id <20110120114956.GP30701@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr>
and subject line Re: Bug#610126: RM: chef/0.8.16-4.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #610126,
regarding RM: chef/0.8.16-4.2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
610126: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=610126
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm

I'm also filing an RM request for ohai due to RC bug
596351. chef is a reverse dependency which needs to be
removed at the same time.

Please remove chef from testing.

See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=596351#60


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_GB.UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 15:01:28 +0000, Neil Williams wrote:

> Please remove chef from testing.
> 

On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 15:03:06 +0000, Neil Williams wrote:

> Please remove ohai from testing (similar bug filed to remove chef as well).
> 
removal hints added.

Cheers,
Julien

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---

Reply to: