Re: Is #606794 critical enough to be fixed in lenny?

["Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>]

On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 21:36 +0100, Roland Gruber wrote:
> Am 16.01.2011 16:53, schrieb Adam D. Barratt:
> > Yes, this looks worth fixing in lenny.  Please could you send a debdiff
> > of your proposed change?
> 
> I built a new version that includes the fix for 606794.
> Please find the debdiff and 2.3.0-2 diff.gz attached.

fwiw, I meant a source debdiff, i.e. "debdiff foo.dsc bar.dsc".  I've
interdiffed the .diff.gzs to check the changes, but a source debdiff
would have been more convenient.

Please go ahead with the upload (bearing in mind that the deadline for
acceptance into the next point release is tomorrow).

Regards,

Adam