[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#610076: marked as done (unblock: nss/3.12.8-2)

Your message dated Sun, 16 Jan 2011 16:30:35 +0100
with message-id <20110116153035.GU2813@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr>
and subject line Re: Bug#610076: unblock: nss/3.12.8-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #610076,
regarding unblock: nss/3.12.8-2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
610076: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=610076
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package nss

I know this is probably not the right time for this, and I apologize, but I
only started actively backporting my packages recently. This new version
contains a small change to make backports for lenny not require any change
besides a new changelog entry. As I do expect nss updates to squeeze that
would also need to be pushed to lenny-backports, it will make my work easier.

Thanks. 

unblock nss/3.12.8-2

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

diff -Nru nss-3.12.8/debian/changelog nss-3.12.8/debian/changelog
--- nss-3.12.8/debian/changelog	2010-10-07 08:51:49.000000000 +0200
+++ nss-3.12.8/debian/changelog	2011-01-14 16:15:41.000000000 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+nss (3.12.8-2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * debian/rules: Fallback to DEB_BUILD_ARCH when dpkg-architecture does't
+    support DEB_BUILD_ARCH_BITS.
+  * debian/control: Lower build depends on dpkg-dev to (>= 1.13.19), which
+    was the value before starting to use DEB_BUILD_ARCH_BITS.
+
+ -- Mike Hommey <glandium@debian.org>  Fri, 14 Jan 2011 16:07:35 +0100
+
 nss (3.12.8-1) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * New upstream release.
diff -Nru nss-3.12.8/debian/control nss-3.12.8/debian/control
--- nss-3.12.8/debian/control	2010-10-07 08:20:56.000000000 +0200
+++ nss-3.12.8/debian/control	2011-01-14 16:15:41.000000000 +0100
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Maintainers of Mozilla-related packages <pkg-mozilla-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org>
 Uploaders: Mike Hommey <glandium@debian.org>
-Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 7.0.50~), dpkg-dev (>= 1.15.4), libnspr4-dev (>= 4.8.6), zlib1g-dev, libsqlite3-dev (>= 3.3.9)
+Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 7.0.50~), dpkg-dev (>= 1.13.19), libnspr4-dev (>= 4.8.6), zlib1g-dev, libsqlite3-dev (>= 3.3.9)
 Standards-Version: 3.9.1.0
 Homepage: http://www.mozilla.org/projects/security/pki/nss/
 Vcs-Git: git://git.debian.org/git/pkg-mozilla/nss.git
diff -Nru nss-3.12.8/debian/rules nss-3.12.8/debian/rules
--- nss-3.12.8/debian/rules	2010-10-07 08:20:56.000000000 +0200
+++ nss-3.12.8/debian/rules	2011-01-14 16:15:41.000000000 +0100
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 MOD_MINOR_VERSION := $(word 2, $(subst ., ,$(UPSTREAM_VERSION)))
 MOD_PATCH_VERSION := $(word 3, $(subst ., ,$(UPSTREAM_VERSION)))
 
-ifeq (64,$(shell dpkg-architecture -qDEB_BUILD_ARCH_BITS))
+ifneq (,$(filter 64 alpha amd64 ia64 s390x,$(shell dpkg-architecture -qDEB_BUILD_ARCH_BITS 2> /dev/null || dpkg-architecture -qDEB_BUILD_ARCH)))
 USE_64 := USE_64=1
 else
 USE_64 :=

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 10:49:18 +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:

> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
> 
> Please unblock package nss
> 
> I know this is probably not the right time for this, and I apologize, but I
> only started actively backporting my packages recently. This new version
> contains a small change to make backports for lenny not require any change
> besides a new changelog entry. As I do expect nss updates to squeeze that
> would also need to be pushed to lenny-backports, it will make my work easier.
> 
Sorry, but not right now.

Cheers,
Julien

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: