On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 13:59:03 +0000, Antonio Radici wrote: > On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 02:35:04PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > > That doesn't sound grave to me. Just because you have to modify > > /etc/init.d/cfengine3 instead of /etc/default/cfengine3 doesn't make the > > package unusable, does it? > > Hi Julien, > thanks for your quick answer; I thought this could be a problem because > we are shipping /etc/default/cfengine3 and since you have that file, as > a user, you expect that once you modify it, then it will work exactly as > the other files in /etc/default; basically we are not doing what we are > promising to do. > I'm not saying it's not a problem. I'm saying it pretty closely matches the "bug which has a major effect on the usability of a package, without rendering it completely unusable to everyone" description. > As you said, it doesn't make the package unusable but it is a problem > for the user; I'm happy to set the severity of this bug back to > important if you want and we will leave things as they are on squeeze; > the upload is just a 6 lines change though (3 in cfengine3.default and 3 > in cfengine3.init) and it is already ready. > > Let me know your preference and I'll proceed accordingly. > Then set it back to important, and fix it in 6.0.1 if you like. Cheers, Julien
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature