Re: Bug#603702: unblock: iceowl/1.0~b1+dfsg1-2

[Moritz Mühlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org>]

Adam D. Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk> schrieb:
> On Fri, 2010-12-24 at 09:22 +0100, Guido Günther wrote: 
>> Hi,
>> On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 10:02:45PM +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> > On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 15:58 +0100, Guido Günther wrote:
>> > > As discussed with Moritz from the security team there won't be any
>> > > security support from upstream for any of the beta releases. So I added
>> > > a note explaining that to README.Debian:
> [...]
>> > Just to check that we're all on the same page, having read the addition
>> > to README.Debian, does this mean that there won't be any updates at all
>> > to the package via security.d.o during squeeze's lifetime?
>> 
>> Yes.
>
> If neither upstream nor the security team are willing to provide
> security support, are you prepared to do that yourself for squeeze's
> lifetime as stable, if required?

It's unproblematic, although iceowl includes the mozilla code base, it
doesn't face the attacks of a web browser, after all it's just calendar
app.

Cheers,
        Moritz