Re: Accepted gnumed-client 0.7.10-2 (source all)
On 12/30/2010 09:11 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-12-30 at 20:52 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 20:45:10 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 08:39:29PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 19:32:06 +0000, Andreas Tille wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> gnumed-client (0.7.10-2) testing-proposed-updates;
>>>>> urgency=low .
>>>> Why does this contain the 0.8.5-1 changelog entry? That looks
>>>> broken.
>>>
>>> Because package version 0.8.5-1 was released previosely and I
>>> intended to keep a full record of all released packages in the
>>> changelog.
>>
>> That makes no sense. The 0.7.10-2 package doesn't contain the
>> changes from 0.8.5-1, why should it contain its changelog?
>
> More to the point, it's going to make the BTS believe that 0.7.10-2
> is a direct descendent of 0.8.5-1 and contains any bugs present in
> the latter version, which is clearly not the case. The previous
> intermingling of 0.7.10-1 in the unstable changelog is also broken;
> the packages are not descended from each other, the changelog should
> not claim that they are.
>
@Andreas: Can you please re-upload with that section removed from the
changelog?
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
Reply to: