[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#608350: marked as done (unblock: gnash/0.8.8-7)

Your message dated Fri, 07 Jan 2011 22:53:04 +0100
with message-id <4D278B40.3080801@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#608350: unblock: gnash/0.8.8-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #608350,
regarding unblock: gnash/0.8.8-7
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
608350: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=608350
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock


Please unblock package gnash

Main reason to unblock it is that 0.8.8-7 makes it working on kfreebsd-*
systems too by disabling jemalloc (#604573). Thanks.

gnash (0.8.8-7)
   * Added patch 07_jemalloc to make kfreebsd-* archs treated like *bsd oses
     (Closes: #604573).
   * Transitional packages architecture from any to all (Closes: #603609).
   * Added patch to fix texinfo docs.
gnash (0.8.8-6)
   * Added patches that fix some upstream bugs
     + 01_38be50cecc, 02_b3d5da01fb, 03_c22769f0ab
     + 04_baseuri1, 05_baseuri2
     + 06_ytfix: youtube videos starts immediately.
   * Fixed browser-plugin-gnash piuparts error.

unblock gnash/0.8.8-7

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 12/30/2010 06:42 AM, Gabriele Giacone wrote:
> 
> Please unblock package gnash
> 
> Main reason to unblock it is that 0.8.8-7 makes it working on 
> kfreebsd-* systems too by disabling jemalloc (#604573). Thanks.
> 

#604573 isn't RC, and isn't a regression.

Besides, the diff shows the following:

 Package: gnash-common-opengl
 Priority: extra
-Architecture: any
+Architecture: all
 Depends: gnash-common (= ${binary:Version}), ${misc:Depends}

It means that if we binNMU gnash, the first dependency will become
unsatisfiable.

lintian shows that problem:

$ lintian gnash_0.8.8-7.dsc
E: gnash source: not-binnmuable-all-depends-any klash-opengl -> klash
E: gnash source: not-binnmuable-all-depends-any gnash-opengl -> gnash
E: gnash source: not-binnmuable-all-depends-any swfdec-mozilla ->
browser-plugin-gnash
E: gnash source: not-binnmuable-all-depends-any gnash-common-opengl ->
gnash-common

(Shouldn't that be added to ftp-masters reject list?)

Given the lintian errors and non-rc-ness of 604573, I'll close this
bugreport and not unblock the package. If you think I'm on crack and
missed an important detail, please let me know.

Regards,

-- 
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/

--- End Message ---
Reply to: