[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#608413: Possible patch for libio-socket-inet6-perl?

Hi all

On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 01:25:09PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Wed, Jan  5, 2011 at 13:07:54 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 12:42:37PM +0100, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> > > All in all, 2.65 has been in unstable for over 110 days now and I've
> > > been told the release team is OK with 2.65 but not with the packaging
> > > changes and would accept 2.65 with the old packaging.
> > 
> > Oh, great. Didn't saw such conversation with RT!
> > 
> I said on IRC the debian/rules change was wrong, and for the rest I'd
> like an ack/review from a perl person, which I'm not.

Yes, the 'dh_clean -k' -> 'dh_clean' change is not correct. I'm cc'ing
for the rest the debian-perl list, to have some further comments from
the other team members.

Julien, on the other side I got confirmation from Julien Blache in
#608413, that the backported change from the diff 2.54 to 2.55 would
work again with the cricket setup.

Debian Perl Group and Masahito, could you give some input for the rest
of the changes between the versions in squeeze and unstable for


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: