Bug#608847: marked as done (unblock: kdebase-workspace/4:4.4.5-6)
Your message dated Tue, 04 Jan 2011 19:11:22 +0000
with message-id <1294168282.15682.110.camel@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#608847: unblock: kdebase-workspace/4:4.4.5-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #608847,
regarding unblock: kdebase-workspace/4:4.4.5-6
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
608847: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=608847
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Please unblock package kdebase-workspace
Hello,
this revision documents (in README.Debian) a workaround for quite annoying bug
and fixes the crash on kFreeBSD that was caused by a couple of *.desktop files
being wrongly ommited from kFreeBSD packages..
unblock kdebase-workspace/4:4.4.5-6
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (100, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.36-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=lt_LT.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=lt_LT.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 01:53 +0200, Modestas Vainius wrote:
> Please unblock package kdebase-workspace
>
> Hello,
>
> this revision documents (in README.Debian) a workaround for quite annoying bug
> and fixes the crash on kFreeBSD that was caused by a couple of *.desktop files
> being wrongly ommited from kFreeBSD packages..
Unblocked; thanks.
Regards,
Adam
--- End Message ---
Reply to: