Bug#608610: marked as done (unblock: apache2/2.2.16-6)
Your message dated Sun, 02 Jan 2011 11:25:58 +0000
with message-id <1293967558.26230.11948.camel@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#608610: unblock: apache2/2.2.16-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #608610,
regarding unblock: apache2/2.2.16-6
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
608610: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=608610
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Please unblock package apache2. It adds a missing dependency to the init script
which could lead to apache2 not starting on boot in some configurations (a
regression from lenny). Thanks.
apache2 (2.2.16-6) unstable; urgency=low
* Also add $named to the secondary-init-script example.
-- Stefan Fritsch <sf@debian.org> Sat, 01 Jan 2011 22:55:15 +0100
apache2 (2.2.16-5) unstable; urgency=medium
* Add $named to the init script dependency header, since apache depends on
DNS in some configurations. Closes: #608437
* Update outdated description of /etc/apache2/magic in README.Debian.
Closes: #603586
-- Stefan Fritsch <sf@debian.org> Fri, 31 Dec 2010 01:22:19 +0100
unblock apache2/2.2.16-6
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sun, 2011-01-02 at 01:14 +0100, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> Please unblock package apache2. It adds a missing dependency to the init script
> which could lead to apache2 not starting on boot in some configurations (a
> regression from lenny). Thanks.
Unblocked; thanks.
Regards,
Adam
--- End Message ---
Reply to: