Re: New slurm-llnl package for squeeze
On Sat, 2010-11-06 at 09:01 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> On 4 November 2010 at 17:56, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> | It looks like the current Debian package doesn't set LD_LIBRARY_PATH at
> | all in the slurm-llnl-slurmdbd init script. Was the addition of that to
> | the init script in the updated package intentional? (Upstream's init
> | script does set LD_LIBRARY_PATH, so it makes sense there).
>
> So I am totally confused. Does that mean there is no bug?
Gennaro's proposed fix modifies two init scripts, only one of which
previously set LD_LIBRARY_PATH. The fix for that one script is fine,
the question was whether the change to the second script was intentional
and appropriate (as it will lead to an extra directory being added to
LD_LIBRARY_PATH which was not previously included).
> Also, the consensus was that for testing I need to upload to testing rather
> than testing-security?
Yes.
Regards,
Adam
Reply to: