[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#601971: marked as done (unblock: liboauth/0.9.1-1)



Your message dated Thu, 04 Nov 2010 22:27:20 +0100
with message-id <4CD32538.1000004@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#601971: unblock: liboauth/0.9.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #601971,
regarding unblock: liboauth/0.9.1-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
601971: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=601971
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package liboauth

This package is blocking major bugs in twitter clients, an example of such a bug is bug #588235 .
Twitter recently dropped support for Basic Auth and now all twitter clients are forced to use OAuth to
authenticate to Twitter. libOAuth is the ONLY OAuth 1.0 library written in C, and hence all Twitter clients
written in C need this.
Without this package, BTI and other twitter clients will not function in squeeze, as they would not be able
to authenticate with Twitter.

libOAuth was accepted very recently into Debian Unstable, and that is why it isn't in squeeze yet.

unblock liboauth/0.9.1-1

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers maverick-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'maverick-updates'), (500, 'maverick-security'), (500, 'maverick')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.35-22-generic (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 11/01/2010 07:18 PM, gregor herrmann wrote:
> 
> I gues uploading bti to experimental might make testing for others 
> easier ...
> 

ok, let's accept this in Squeeze. Changes in bti seem ok and the library
is small enough.

Cheers,

-- 
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/


--- End Message ---

Reply to: