Bug#601648: marked as done (unblock: pacparser/1.2.6-1)
Your message dated Thu, 28 Oct 2010 15:10:05 +0200
with message-id <4CC9762D.2050408@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#601648: unblock: pacparser/1.2.6-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #601648,
regarding unblock: pacparser/1.2.6-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
601648: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=601648
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi,
I just realised pacparser 1.2.6-1 had run into the freeze. It should contain an
upstream fix for #596796 (you can see it built successfully on powerpc).
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.6
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-2-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_AU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 28/10/2010 06:48, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal
>
> Hi,
>
> I just realised pacparser 1.2.6-1 had run into the freeze. It should
> contain an upstream fix for #596796 (you can see it built successfully
> on powerpc).
>
1.2.x series were uploaded during the freeze. The quantity of changes is
significant and we are not able to accept it at this point of the freeze.
Besides, 1.0.9 is present on powerpc. #596796 doesn't affect testing.
And,, pacparser doesn't seem to have any reverse dependency yet.
So, I don't see any reason (tbh) why we should accept pacparser in
Squeeze. (Does it fix some critical bug?)
I'm closing this bugreport. But, if you feel that you have a valuable
information to share, please re-open it and ask again.
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--- End Message ---
Reply to: