Bug#595417: marked as done (unblock: mknbi/1.4.4-7)
Your message dated Mon, 06 Sep 2010 19:16:55 +0100
with message-id <1283797015.11864.256.camel@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#595417: unblock: mknbi/1.4.4-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #595417,
regarding unblock: mknbi/1.4.4-7
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
595417: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=595417
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
mknbi (1.4.4-7) unstable; urgency=low
* Adding patch from Colin Watson <cjwatson@ubuntu.com> to pass
appropriate options to ld and as to make multilib build work
(Closes: #593609).
* Updating standards version to 3.9.1.
-- Daniel Baumann <daniel@debian.org> Wed, 01 Sep 2010 10:19:19 +0200
--
Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: daniel.baumann@panthera-systems.net
Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sat, 2010-09-04 at 19:06 +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> On 09/04/2010 04:56 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > So far as I can see, this would resolve build issues for the package on
> > amd64; this isn't a regression for the archive, however, as there are no
> > amd64 mknbi packages in Debian. In fact, despite the changes in mknbi
> > 1.4.4-2 last year, the buildds have never attempted to build it on
> > anything other than i386, as the package is in Packages-arch-specific.
>
> when amd64 was introduced, nobody though of updating the p-a-s entry for
> mknbi, filled bug for that.
Unblocked.
Regards,
Adam
--- End Message ---
Reply to: