[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#592141: marked as done (alien-arena: freeze exception)

Your message dated Sat, 4 Sep 2010 20:33:06 +0200
with message-id <20100904183306.GS5918@patate.is-a-geek.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#592141: alien-arena: freeze exception
has caused the Debian Bug report #592141,
regarding alien-arena: freeze exception
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
592141: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=592141
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Severity: normal

Hi, 

alien-arena (and alien-arena-data) upstream version 7.45 was just
released last weekend. I had originally planned to work on a package for
that this weekend (before I heard about the freeze). I'm trying to
figure out whether I should spend any time on it at this point. Would a
freeze exception be possible?  

I don't foresee any need to change any packaging; just updating the
upstream sources.  You can see the upstream change log here [0].  I
don't see anything likely to cause any breakage.

Thanks,
Mike

[0] http://icculus.org/alienarena/changelogs/7.45.txt

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 10:49:26 -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:

> On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 05:36:56 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> > On  0, Michael Gilbert <michael.s.gilbert@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > I don't foresee any need to change any packaging; just updating the
> > > upstream sources.  You can see the upstream change log here [0].  I
> > > don't see anything likely to cause any breakage.
> > > 
> > 
> > Correct me if I'm wrong but this version fixes only minor issues and
> > adds some new features. I won't grant a freeze exception for this (because
> > it doesn't match the criterias we described in our last mail to d-d-a). If
> > you have strong arguments to have this in Squeeze, please share.
> 
> I don't have any sound argument against that.  Its simply a matter of
> timing.  I was planning to upload the new version last weekend, but
> the freeze happened before that.  If I had known the freeze was
> coming, I would have worked on it 3 days earlier, and it would have gone
> in. I would prefer to get the newer upstream version into this release,
> but I can understand the rational for not doing so.
> 
Looks like this is not happening, closing the bug.

Cheers,
Julien

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: