[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#594890: marked as done (unblock: libvigraimpex/1.7.0+dfsg-7)

Your message dated Sat, 4 Sep 2010 12:38:10 +0200
with message-id <20100904103810.GL5918@patate.is-a-geek.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#594890: unblock: libvigraimpex/1.7.0+dfsg-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #594890,
regarding unblock: libvigraimpex/1.7.0+dfsg-7
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
594890: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=594890
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception

Please unblock package libvigraimpex. In the new version:
- The default compiler is used on all architectures (bug #588168).
- Documentation was improved (bugs #590069, #590068).
- All versions in the symbols file was bumped to 1.7.0 (that should have been done in -5, when I renamed the shared library package, oops). 

unblock libvigraimpex/1.7.0+dfsg-7

--
Jakub Wilk

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 14:28:31 +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:

> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: freeze-exception
> 
> Please unblock package libvigraimpex. In the new version:
> - The default compiler is used on all architectures (bug #588168).
> - Documentation was improved (bugs #590069, #590068).
> - All versions in the symbols file was bumped to 1.7.0 (that should
> have been done in -5, when I renamed the shared library package,
> oops).
> 
The last one is basically a nop, you could have set it to 0 and it would
have been fine, since libvigraimpex2 is a new package, aiui.

> unblock libvigraimpex/1.7.0+dfsg-7
> 
Done, thanks for your work.

Cheers,
Julien

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: