Your message dated Fri, 3 Sep 2010 12:34:17 +0200 with message-id <20100903103417.GH10843@patate.is-a-geek.org> and subject line Re: Bug#579795: nmu: libapt dependencies has caused the Debian Bug report #579795, regarding transition: apt to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 579795: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=579795 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: nmu: libapt dependencies
- From: Michael Vogt <mvo@debian.org>
- Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 21:57:45 +0200
- Message-id: <20100430195745.3559.54149.reportbug@debian-vm>
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu This is a bit of a meta binNMU request. The apt team wants to upload a new version with a ABI break to unstable. The version is currently in experimental and requires rebuilds of the packages that depend on libapt-pkg-libc6.9-6-4.8. What is the best way forward to keep the disruption as low as possible for the archive? Ideally after the upload of apt to unstable the binNUMs would follow relatively quickly for important packages like aptitude, python-apt, libept etc. Please let us know when a good time for this is and if we should provide a list of the individual packages. Thanks, Michael -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-3-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Michael Vogt <mvo@debian.org>, 579795-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#579795: nmu: libapt dependencies
- From: Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org>
- Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 12:34:17 +0200
- Message-id: <20100903103417.GH10843@patate.is-a-geek.org>
- In-reply-to: <20100430195745.3559.54149.reportbug@debian-vm>
- References: <20100430195745.3559.54149.reportbug@debian-vm>
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 21:57:45 +0200, Michael Vogt wrote: > This is a bit of a meta binNMU request. The apt team wants to > upload a new version with a ABI break to unstable. The version > is currently in experimental and requires rebuilds > of the packages that depend on libapt-pkg-libc6.9-6-4.8. > jcristau@franck:~$ dak ls -s testing apt apt | 0.8.0 | testing | source, amd64, armel, hppa, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc Closing this bug. Cheers, JulienAttachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---