Re: library tranistion proposal exiv2(0.20): libexiv2-6 -> libexiv2-9
On Tue, June 15, 2010 11:39, Mark Purcell wrote:
> On Monday 07 June 2010 22:24:17 Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> > A targetted fix for that bug with no ABI change is impossible?
>>
>> If the primary reason for proposing the transition now is to pull in the
>> fix for that bug, then a targetted fix would be much appreciated if
>> possible (it's one less transition on the to-do list, for one thing).
[...]
> I have had a detailed attempt at the Nikon fix without an ABI change, but
> it would appear to not be possible without an ABI change and rebuild of
> all packages.
>
> Thus my request for the libexiv2-9 transition remains.
Please go ahead.
Regards,
Adam
Reply to: