[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#578369: marked as done (nmu: aeolus, ams, jaaa, japa)



Your message dated Mon, 19 Apr 2010 13:20:05 +0100
with message-id <cc6abfeff21788b18fec17ad5f04f341.squirrel@adsl.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#578369: nmu: aeolus, ams, jaaa, japa
has caused the Debian Bug report #578369,
regarding nmu: aeolus, ams, jaaa, japa
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
578369: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=578369
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal

Hi!

Another round off needed binNMUs found via dak auto cruft's:

nmu aeolus . ALL . -m "Build against libclalsadrv2"
nmu ams . ALL . -m "Build against libclalsadrv2"
nmu jaaa . ALL . -m "Build against libclalsadrv2"
nmu japa . ALL . -m "Build against libclalsadrv2"


Best regards,
  Alexander

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.4
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32.11-dsa-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Mon, April 19, 2010 12:24, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
> * Alexander Reichle-Schmehl <tolimar@debian.org> [100419 13:02]:
>> nmu aeolus . ALL . -m "Build against libclalsadrv2"
>> nmu ams . ALL . -m "Build against libclalsadrv2"
>> nmu jaaa . ALL . -m "Build against libclalsadrv2"
>> nmu japa . ALL . -m "Build against libclalsadrv2"
>
> That should be:

Assuming that the version number refers to the unstable source, either
syntax is fine.

> nmu aeolus_0.8.2-3 . ALL . -m "Build against libclalsadrv2"

0.8.4-2 is the current version in the archive, although it seems to be
FTBFS on many arches.  The failures largely appear to be due to the use of
"-march=native" so I haven't given them back.

> nmu ams_2.0.1-3 . ALL . -m "Build against libclalsadrv2"
> nmu jaaa_0.4.2-2 . ALL . -m "Build against libclalsadrv2"
> nmu japa_0.2.1-3 . ALL . -m "Build against libclalsadrv2"

These have all been scheduled.

Regards,

Adam



--- End Message ---

Reply to: