[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#576196: marked as done (RM: phpgroupware/1:0.9.16.012+dfsg-10)



Your message dated Sat, 3 Apr 2010 16:17:50 +0100
with message-id <dcb580150704ed446c0ddba41760efa0.squirrel@adsl.funkybadger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#576196: RM: phpgroupware/1:0.9.16.012+dfsg-10
has caused the Debian Bug report #576196,
regarding RM: phpgroupware/1:0.9.16.012+dfsg-10
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
576196: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=576196
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm

Hi.

phpgroupware 0.9.16 is not compatible with PHP 5.3, and upstream seems to have been unable to fix this (see #575247).

As a consequence, I think it is wiser to ask for its removal from testing/squeeze.

Should a new version of patches be provided by upstream or anyone else, we may still be able to provide unofficial packages starting from the latest svn-buildpackage state.

Thanks in advance.

Best regards,


-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-3-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Thu, April 1, 2010 13:37, Olivier Berger wrote:
> phpgroupware 0.9.16 is not compatible with PHP 5.3, and upstream seems to
> have been unable to fix this (see #575247).
>
> As a consequence, I think it is wiser to ask for its removal from
> testing/squeeze.

Removal hint added.

Regards,

Adam



--- End Message ---

Reply to: