Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org> writes:
> On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 07:39:45PM +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 19:04 +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
>> > On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 06:57:20PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
>> > > On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 09:39:17AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
>> > > > nmu gluezilla_2.4.3-1 galeon_2.0.7-1.2 chmsee_1.0.7-1.2 gnome-python-extras_2.25.3-4.1 xiphos_3.1.2-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild with fixed dh_xulrunner, see #567746'
>> > > > dw gluezilla_2.4.3-1 galeon_2.0.7-1.2 chmsee_1.0.7-1.2 gnome-python-extras_2.25.3-4.1 xiphos_3.1.2-1 . ALL . -m 'xulrunner (>= 1.9.1.6-2)'
>> > > I'm wondering... is the >= syntax properly handled ? 1.9.1.6-2 has been
>> > > available on (some) architectures for a few days, but none of the
>> > > packages above have apparently been attempted to be built.
>> > Cyril Brulebois enlighted me with the obvious: the dep-wait should be on
>> > xulrunner-dev (>= 1.9.1.6-2), not xulrunner.
>> dep-waits fixed.
> It seems the nmus haven't triggered on the architectures where
> xulrunner-dev >= 1.9.1.6-2 is available. Could you check what is
> happening ?
I don't see this. The binNMUs haven't triggered for alpha, armel, mips,
powerpc and sparc, which all have no newer version of xulrunner in the
archive:
https://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=xulrunner%2Cgluezilla%2Cgaleon%2Cchmsee%2Cgnome-python-extras%2Cxiphos&maint=&dist=unstable
Marc
--
Fachbegriffe der Informatik - Einfach erklärt
18: Vorbereitet für den Multimediaeinsatz
Es sind noch zwei Slots auf dem Motherboard frei. (Peter Berlich)
Attachment:
pgpPRGGCLuOqk.pgp
Description: PGP signature