On Sun, 2010-01-24 at 15:17 +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Jan 24, maximilian attems <max@stro.at> wrote: > > > the plan as decided in Portland was to go forward with openvz > > if upstream provides us with a patch in time. as currently this > > looks quite bad (latest available patch is for 2.6.27, there is > > no sign of a patch for 2.6.32, nor any schedule like it happened > > to be for Lenny). > I expect that it will be released after the first beta of RHEL 6. [...] I believe there already has been a beta, just not a public one. RH seems to be very secretive about this release. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Any smoothly functioning technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part