Re: Bug#558412: binutils-dev: Please provide libbfd_pic.a
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 07:57:51AM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> > This did not seem to get any attention on debian-devel, so I am cross
> > posting to debian-release. I would really be interested to know if
> > others think that the binNMU approach suggested by Matthias is
> > acceptable and/or viable.
>
> Unless it's an option to include oprofile into binutils source package,
> I don't see what's wrong with the binNMU approach?
Another option would be to have #548715 addressed, and stop caring about
oprofile.
Mike
Reply to: