Re: Accepted gnumed-client 0.7.10-2 (source all)
On Thu, 2010-12-30 at 20:52 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 20:45:10 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 08:39:29PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > > On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 19:32:06 +0000, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > >
> > > > gnumed-client (0.7.10-2) testing-proposed-updates; urgency=low
> > > > .
> > > Why does this contain the 0.8.5-1 changelog entry? That looks broken.
> >
> > Because package version 0.8.5-1 was released previosely and I intended
> > to keep a full record of all released packages in the changelog.
>
> That makes no sense. The 0.7.10-2 package doesn't contain the changes
> from 0.8.5-1, why should it contain its changelog?
More to the point, it's going to make the BTS believe that 0.7.10-2 is a
direct descendent of 0.8.5-1 and contains any bugs present in the latter
version, which is clearly not the case. The previous intermingling of
0.7.10-1 in the unstable changelog is also broken; the packages are not
descended from each other, the changelog should not claim that they are.
Regards,
Adam
Reply to: