On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 22:06:52 -0500, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > I am curious as to whether the release team thinks that #608347 (quoted > below) is really RC. Do I need to target the fix for this to go into > Squeeze? > If the dbg package is indeed unusable then that's a grave bug in that package. It can probably get a squeeze-ignore tag at this point though, but if it's easy enough to fix then I think we should do that. Cheers, Julien
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature