[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#606533: marked as done (unblock: postgrey/1.32-6)

Your message dated Tue, 21 Dec 2010 19:13:25 +0000
with message-id <1292958806.8552.109.camel@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#606533: unblock: postgrey/1.32-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #606533,
regarding unblock: postgrey/1.32-6
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org

606533: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=606533
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package postgrey 1.32-6, it contains a fix to resolve the serious
#594451 which breaks a lenny->squeeze upgrade of postgrey

If you have any questions, let me know.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.30-2-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_IE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_IE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Tue, 2010-12-21 at 00:34 +0000, Antonio Radici wrote:
> I have rebuilt from another system, where the .orig.tar.gz was the
> correct one and it seems to have done the trick; I have just got a mail
> saying that my changes were ACCEPTED, can you please unblock the
> transition of this package to squeeze? 




--- End Message ---

Reply to: