On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 15:04:13 +0000 "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@funky-badger.org> wrote: > As a side-effect, it will not be possible to include packages which are > not part of the corresponding stable release. If we remove minitube > from Squeeze now, further updates once Squeeze is stable would then need > to be made via backports, rather than volatile. > > I have no particular preference which route is taken, but thought it was > worth spelling out the consequences. I would either like to see a freeze exception for 1.3 or, if that's not possible, a removal of 1.1. Releasing Squeeze with 1.1 makes no sense for me. But it's up to the release team to decide on this. Cheers, sur5r -- ceterum censeo microsoftem esse delendam.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature