On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 09:07:30 +0100, Stefan Fritsch wrote: > OK. I think the best way forward is this: > > - We will not include gnutls in the first round of RFC5746-DSAs for > Lenny, which I hope to release before Christmas. > - gnutls in squeeze will be updated by backport to 2.8.6 rather than > by upgrading to 2.10. This will happen as soon as someone has the time > to do the testing. IMHO, this can also be done in a DSA or point > release and should not delay squeeze's release. > - When the backport+testing for 2.8.6 is done, we can decide about > what to do with 2.4.2 in Lenny. > Thanks for the summary. Cheers, Julien
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature