Re: Bug#607293: 75 unreported RC bugs, (mostly?) fixable by rebuilding / could lintian please prevent such packages from being uploaded in future?
- To: "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
- Cc: Carsten Hey <carsten@debian.org>, 607293@bugs.debian.org, debian-release@lists.debian.org, ftp.debian.org@packages.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#607293: 75 unreported RC bugs, (mostly?) fixable by rebuilding / could lintian please prevent such packages from being uploaded in future?
- From: Joerg Jaspert <joerg@debian.org>
- Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 23:31:35 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 87lj3oghfc.fsf@gkar.ganneff.de>
- Mail-followup-to: "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>, Carsten Hey <carsten@debian.org>, 607293@bugs.debian.org, debian-release@lists.debian.org, ftp.debian.org@packages.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 1292525062.17170.22.camel@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org> (Adam D. Barratt's message of "Thu, 16 Dec 2010 18:44:15 +0000")
- References: <[🔎] 20101216175613.GQ31514@furrball.stateful.de> <[🔎] 1292525062.17170.22.camel@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org>
On 12331 March 1977, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> Package: lintian
>> Severity: wishlist
> [...]
>> To get a list of affected binary packages:
>>
>> w3m http://lintian.debian.org/tags/install-info-used-in-maintainer-script.html | awk '/[(]binary[)]$/ {print $1}'
> [...]
>> Could lintian maintainers please add this lintian tag to
>> data/output/ftp-master-nonfatal, although this shouldn't occur much in
>> future since debconf doesn't create this snippet anymore?
> Well, we could, but it would be somewhat redundant. The list of reject
> tags in lintian is generated from the list on ftp-master, not
> vice-versa; if you want the list of tags used by ftp-master to
> auto-reject packages, you need to convince them, not us.
Im not against adding more tags.
Im against doing it right now, right after squeeze is a better time. We
dont want to break any possibly needed upload by those packages here.
But lintian could sure go already and make this E, its "Severity:
normal, Certainty: possible" a Warning now.And Certainty only possible,
does that mean we get false-positives?
--
bye, Joerg
It seems to me that the account creation step could be fully automated:
checking the box "approved by DAM" could trigger an insert into the LDAP
database thereby creating the account.
<1375.143.121.153.52.1122977888.squirrel@wm.kinkhorst.nl>
Reply to: