Re: emacs23 23.2+1-7 suitable for squeeze?
"Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk> writes:
> As a side note, because -6 was never uploaded, -7 should have been built
> using dpkg-buildpackage -v, so that the .changes for -7 included the
> stanza from -6. This is to ensure that the BTS knows that the emacs23
> package now in unstable includes the fix for #600826; I've just fixed
> the version information, but as things were the BTS believed that the
> bug had been re-introduced in -6.
Ahh, OK. Sorry I overlooked that.
Thanks
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4
Reply to: