Bug#605726: marked as done (unblock: slurm-llnl/2.1.11-1squeeze2)
Your message dated Sat, 11 Dec 2010 23:55:24 +0100
with message-id <4D04015C.4080100@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#605726: unblock: slurm-llnl/2.1.11-1squeeze2
has caused the Debian Bug report #605726,
regarding unblock: slurm-llnl/2.1.11-1squeeze2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
605726: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=605726
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
slurm-llnl/2.1.11-1squeeze2 fixes #604207. (But the maintainers
for the bug closer).
Cheers,
Moritz
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.ISO-8859-15@euro (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 12/02/2010 08:27 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 19:46 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
>> slurm-llnl/2.1.11-1squeeze2 fixes #604207. (But the maintainers
>> for the bug closer).
>
> The fix for that bug looks wrong (or at least incomplete) - the report
> is about a problem purging the package due to ucf not being available
> and the chosen solution is to add a dependency on ucf; however, as ucf
> is not essential, the postrm cannot rely on it being available during
> purge even with the dependency.
>
This has been addressed in slurm-llnl/2.1.11-1squeeze3.
Unblocked.
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--- End Message ---
Reply to: