[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#596899: Please unblock ia32-libs/20101012

"Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk> writes:

> On Sat, 2010-12-04 at 08:37 +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
>> On Thursday 18 November 2010 22:24:01 Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
>> >   On Wednesday 17 November 2010 14:26:07 Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> > >  ia32-libs-core (20101117) unstable; urgency=low
>> > >  ia32-libs (20101117) unstable; urgency=low
>> > 
>> > I just uploaded these to sid.
>> I think ia32-libs-core still needs an unblock?
> Why was the Breaks on "ia32-libs (<< 20100418)" dropped?  That isn't

Breaks readded as per policy "7.6.1: Overwriting files in other
packages". Thanks for noticing.

> mentioned in the changelog.  (Nor are the two lines that have
> retrospectively appeared in the changelog for ia32-libs-core 20100421).

Good question actually. Seems like some changes crept in that I had
commited locally but not pushed when Frederik uploaded 20100421.
I've reverted the commit.

> Regards,
> Adam

Uploading ia32-libs-core_20101207_source to mentors. Sponsors

Packages updated:
  [ gcc-4.4 (4.4.5-8) unstable; urgency=low ]
  [ icu (4.4.1-7) testing-proposed-updates; urgency=high ]

The upload contains one more change to the source which I hope is
acceptable for squeeze. I replaced the older fetch-and-build script with
the newer one from ia32-libs (and ia32-libs-gtk) so that they have the
same script again. This includes the part that automatically generates
the debian/changelog entries for the updated debs. So the future
debian/changelog entries of ia32-libs-core, ia32-libs and ia32-libs-gtk
will all look the same too.


Reply to: