[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#606102: marked as done (unblock: live-build/2.0.9-1)



Your message dated Mon, 06 Dec 2010 18:34:28 +0100
with message-id <4CFD1EA4.7010300@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#606102: unblock: live-build/2.0.9-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #606102,
regarding unblock: live-build/2.0.9-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
606102: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=606102
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org

live-build (2.0.9-1) unstable; urgency=medium

  [ Daniel Baumann ]
  * Once again updating volatile urls for squeeze.

  [ Ben Armstrong ]
  * Updating lb config --help and man page.

  [ Daniel Baumann ]
  * Unfuzzying German manpage translations.

 -- Daniel Baumann <daniel@debian.org>  Mon, 06 Dec 2010 12:01:43 +0100

--
Address:        Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email:          daniel.baumann@progress-technologies.net
Internet:       http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 06/12/2010 12:39, Daniel Baumann wrote:
Package: release.debian.org

live-build (2.0.9-1) unstable; urgency=medium


Unblocked.

    [ Daniel Baumann ]
    * Once again updating volatile urls for squeeze.

    [ Ben Armstrong ]
    * Updating lb config --help and man page.

    [ Daniel Baumann ]
    * Unfuzzying German manpage translations.

   -- Daniel Baumann<daniel@debian.org>   Mon, 06 Dec 2010 12:01:43 +0100


--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/


--- End Message ---

Reply to: