Re: Bug#404760: closed: fixed in inetutils 2:1.8-1
Hi!
On Sun, 2010-12-05 at 21:39:28 +0100, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> [ CC'ing explicitly Guillem in case he missed the mail ]
>
> On 11/27/2010 03:24 PM, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 at 16:07:19 +0000, Hector Oron wrote:
> >> Could you consider backporting the fix to unstable/testing?
> >
> > I had a go at backporting the fixes that looked important. I haven't tested
> > this work-in-progress version yet, but it compiles...
> >
> > http://git.debian.org/?p=users/smcv/qa/inetutils.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/squeeze
> >
> > Guillem: any chance you could pick this up, or advise on any other changes
> > that are important to have in squeeze?
I guess the inetd se_v4mapped logical inversion fix and the “ping -w”
support, both from upstream 1.8, would be important to have. But then
at that point the 1.6 Debian release would be the same as the one in
unstable except for the indentation changes, the header cleanups, the
unconditionalization of free() calls and the argp switch, which I
pointed out on my initial freeze exception request.
I've hesitated to repeat the work for the 1.6 release as it had already
been done for 1.8, hoping the RT would approve the one in unstable to
migrate to testing. As I'm assuming this will not be the case, and
you've now done already most of the work (except for those two changes
I'd recommend including), feel free to handle the NMU targetting t-p-u.
> ping?
Sorry, wanted to handle the mail the other day but it slipped through
the cracks.
thanks,
guillem
Reply to: