[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#605238: future unblock: wmanager/0.2.1-9



On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 03:30:30PM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 12:39:53PM +0000, Neil McGovern wrote:
> > Hi Peter, thanks for getting in touch
> > 
> > On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 02:13:56PM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> > > Package: release.debian.org
> > > Severity: normal
> > > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> > > Usertags: unblock
> > > 
> > > Thanks for your efforts towards great Debian releases!
> > > 
> > > I've made some changes towards a new version of my wmanager package,
> > > mainly to close #605043 that the submitter kindly placed at "normal"
> > > severity, although I think that for everyone using wmanagerrc-update
> > > in non-English locales with translated update-alternatives messages
> > > it pretty much makes this little part of wmanager quite unusable.
> > > (I never noticed it since update-alternatives does not have Bulgarian
> > > message translations)
> > 
> > Seems like it also removes user data, so should be RC.
> > 
> > > Would this be considered a good enough reason to unblock wmanager-0.2.1-9
> > > for Squeeze?
> > 
> > Yes, but..
> > 
> > > I've not uploaded it yet, and I've also taken the liberty of making
> > > some other changes that should be no-ops from a usability and
> > > buildability (to coin a word) standpoint; you may find them in the
> > > attached debdiff:
> > 
> > These other changes woudn't. Debhelper is especially worrying, it can
> > introduce strange behaviour on some cases.
> 
> Fair enough.
> 
> > Could we have just the #605043 fix?
> 
> Okay.  Attached are two more debdiffs :)  Truth be told, from the order
> I made the commits (yes, my fault for going after low-hanging fruit
> first), I'd slightly prefer to also include the Standards-Version bump;
> but the other debdiff has only the RC bugfix.  Either one would be fine
> with me to upload.

Hi,

I uploaded wmanager 0.1.2-9 yesterday and now it seems like it has been
built on almost all architectures except for sparc, mips and mipsel with
no build failures.

G'luck,
Peter Pentchev

-- 
Peter Pentchev	roam@space.bg    roam@ringlet.net    roam@FreeBSD.org
PGP key:	http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc
Key fingerprint	FDBA FD79 C26F 3C51 C95E  DF9E ED18 B68D 1619 4553
You have, of course, just begun reading the sentence that you have just finished reading.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: