On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 11:56:28PM -0300, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi, > > On 29-08-2010 19:51, Marcelo Jorge Vieira wrote: > > Please unblock libjs-jac, the new version closes #593799. > > Base version: jsjac_1.3.1-3 from testing > Target version: jsjac_1.3.2+dfsg-1 from unstable > 94 files changed, 277 insertions(+), 27383 deletions(-) > > Although the upload closes #593799 it has a new upstream > version and some major changes, so I'm a little bit hesitant in > unblock this without a second opinion. > > Upstream site http://blog.jwchat.org/download/ says the > 1.3.2 happened back in 2008, the Package QA shows the package is > untouched since end 2008. > Sorry for the late response. We have just backported our fixes to the previous upstream version. > * Is it really better to have a new upstream without any > tests at this point? Or, can you elaborate a little bit of why > it would be important to have a new untested upstream version > at this point? > Unfortunately, it was only after packaging this new upstream version in response to the RC bug that we realized it fixes a bug when interacting with some other XMPP clients. Best would be that we open it and close with the new upstream version. > * Can you provide a backport to 1.3.1 that would fix the non-free > bug? > Right now, we have decided to go that way, since the new upstream version does some code changes. Although we have tested it under a deployment of ours, that's not as good as Debian coverage. It's at http://people.debian.org/~metal/jsjac/. > Kind regards, > - -- > Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) > Debian. Freedom to code. Code to freedom! > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ > > iEYEARECAAYFAkx7HdkACgkQCjAO0JDlykbebQCfXVkXncvFNPShIyg2uhQqhqtW > GFIAmwcrW9cL5kBSqpmQ9o26vKu6nHqj > =N58Y > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Regards, Cascardo.
Description: Digital signature