On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 20:32:16 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 07:06:05 +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote: > > > Quoting Julien Cristau (jcristau@debian.org): > > > On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 12:15:48 +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote: > > > > > > > Do you plan to upload 164-2 to unstable at some time in a near future > > > > and then ask for an unblock (though this is a new upstream)? Or would > > > > you upload 163-3 with these updates in case 164 is not suitable for > > > > squeeze? > > > > > > > 164 should be fine with the libgudev move to /lib reverted. > > > > 164-2 juste does this (as well as re-completing the French l10n, > > bringing us to 100% in squeeze, *finally*). Could it be unblocked? > > > I don't like the backport9 patch. This is going to break touchpad > toggle for people, as currently F22 in the kernel maps to > XF86TouchpadToggle in the X keymaps. > Oh well, I was distracted and unblocked this along with the rest of the udebs for d-i beta2 so it's now in testing. Probably not a huge deal. Cheers, Julien
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature