[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#603240: marked as done (unblock: isc-dhcp/4.1.1-P1-12)



Your message dated Sat, 13 Nov 2010 00:58:00 +0100
with message-id <20101112235800.GC5063@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr>
and subject line Re: Bug#603240: unblock: isc-dhcp/4.1.1-P1-12
has caused the Debian Bug report #603240,
regarding unblock: isc-dhcp/4.1.1-P1-12
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
603240: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=603240
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: wishlist

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

isc-dhcp 4.1.1-P1-12 has changes in line with what is acceptable for a freeze
exception, so could you please allow it to enter testing?

- -- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.6
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-2-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_AU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkzc4h4ACgkQIblXXKfZFgJhxQCfe/5f08+unD69npWhbaHGfEJY
2lIAnAmM4UPsHOKgtCvanDH6tenk831r
=2KcB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 22:44:00 -0800, Andrew Pollock wrote:

> isc-dhcp 4.1.1-P1-12 has changes in line with what is acceptable for a
> freeze exception, so could you please allow it to enter testing?
> 
unblocked.

Cheers,
Julien

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---

Reply to: