Re: New slurm-llnl package for squeeze
On Sat, 2010-11-06 at 18:55 +0100, gennaro.oliva@cnr.it wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 03:36:26PM +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > So far as I can see, Gennaro's modification to the second init script -
> > as is - doesn't make sense. It adds $LIBDIR to LD_LIBRARY_PATH, but
> > never defines LIBDIR.
> >
> > I'd be happy with either reverting the modification to the
> > slurm-llnl-slurmdbd init script, or adding the definition of LIBDIR to
> > it (bringing it closer to upstream), but doing one without the other
> > seems wrong;
>
> True, I prefere to stay closer to upstream, therefore it would be better
> to define LIBDIR on the top of the script.
>
> I have made new packages for both unstable
>
> http://www.na.icar.cnr.it/~oliva/debs/repository-20101106/
>
> and testing
>
> http://www.na.icar.cnr.it/~oliva/debs/stable-20101106/
Thanks. The unstable packages do include the LIBDIR definition, but
afaics the same change hasn't been made to the packages for testing?
Regards,
Adam
Reply to: