[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#602237: marked as done (unblock libssh/0.4.5-2)

Your message dated Wed, 3 Nov 2010 10:23:44 +0100
with message-id <20101103092343.GO4770@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr>
and subject line Re: Bug#602237: unblock libssh/0.4.5-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #602237,
regarding unblock libssh/0.4.5-2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org

602237: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=602237
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock


Could you please unblock libssh/0.4.5-2 and allow it to migrate
to squeeze.

This new upstream version fix bug 599687[0] which causes a major
slowdown with Remmina.

 changelog                                                               |    9 ++
 control                                                                 |    2 
 copyright                                                               |   45 +++++++++-
 patches/0001-socket.c-Fixed-setting-max_fd-which-breaks-ssh_selec.patch |   26 +++++
 patches/series                                                          |    1 
 5 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)


Laurent Bigonville

[0] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=599687

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Tue, Nov  2, 2010 at 21:04:02 +0100, Laurent Bigonville wrote:

> Could you please unblock libssh/0.4.5-2 and allow it to migrate
> to squeeze.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

--- End Message ---

Reply to: