[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#594550: marked as done (RM: webkit/1.0.1-4+lenny2)



Your message dated Tue, 2 Nov 2010 14:54:10 +0100
with message-id <20101102135410.GA16673@patate.is-a-geek.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#594550: RM: webkit/1.0.1-4+lenny2
has caused the Debian Bug report #594550,
regarding RM: webkit/1.0.1-4+lenny2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
594550: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=594550
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Severity: normal

Hi,

The lenny webkit package has an insurmountable number of security
vulnerabilities [0].  The version included there was of an experimental
nature, and the only front end available is the builtin GtkLauncher
app, which isn't very functional itself and is likely used by no one.
There are no reverse dependencies.

Please remove the package for the upcoming lenny point release.  I've
brought this up with the security team and webkit maintainers [1],[2],
and there has so far been no objection.  However, I also didn't get
any responses either way.  You may want to try to touch base with
either/both teams directly.

I think removal is the only supportable course of action.

Thanks,
Mike

[0] http://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/source-package/webkit
[1] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-webkit-maintainers/2010-August/001541.html
[2] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/secure-testing-team/2010-August/004281.html



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 00:01:37 -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:

> I think removal is the only supportable course of action.
> 
Seems that this is not happening.  Closing the bug.

Cheers,
Julien

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---

Reply to: