[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#595609: marked as done (unblock: mailgraph/1.14-3)

Your message dated Mon, 1 Nov 2010 20:13:31 +0100
with message-id <20101101191331.GV4770@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr>
and subject line Re: Bug#595609: unblock: mailgraph/1.14-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #595609,
regarding unblock: mailgraph/1.14-3
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
595609: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=595609
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception

Please unblock package mailgraph

testing has 1.14-1. It should indeed have 1.14-2 as I, as sponsor, am
the one and only culprit for missing the freeze date. I built and
uploaded the package on request of its maintainer, but I did not check
that it properly reached the archive. Then I forgot about all this
until the maintainer pinged me again. I uploaded....but that was just
after the freeze.

1.14-2 was a huge packaging change and cleaning after Julien Valroff
took the package over. I reviewed most of the changes and found them
suitable for release (moreover, I always find that having packaging
that the new maintainer is comfortable with is much better for a
package).

So, though it may fail to the release criteria, particularly as they
ar enow, I'd suggest unblocking this package

1.14-3 just added a few translation updates to 1.14-2

unblock mailgraph/1.14-3

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Mon, Nov  1, 2010 at 20:05:52 +0100, Julien Valroff wrote:

> Le lundi 01 nov. 2010 à 19:30:16 (+0100), Julien Cristau a écrit :
> > On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 14:17:52 +0200, Julien Valroff wrote:
> > 
> > > I attach a diff to update the Finnish Debconf translation. I have also
> > > changed the maintainer field to myself (I have taken over the package).
> > > 
> > > diffstat output:
> > >  changelog |    7 +++++++
> > >  control   |    2 +-
> > >  po/fi.po  |   21 +++++++--------------
> > >  3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > Is it ok to upload it to t-p-u?
> > 
> > Yes.
> 
> Thanks.
>  
> > > If so, am I allowed to do it as a DM (the DM-Upload-Allowed field is set in
> > > the version currently in sid, but not in testing).
> > > 
> > Dunno, try it and see?
> 
> The upoad was just accepted.
> As it is an arch=all package, I guess you can already approve the upload?
> 
Approved.  The changelog closes the wrong bug though.

Cheers,
Julien

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: