[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Pre-upload approval for gThumb

On Sun, 24 Oct 2010 13:28:29 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:

> On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 10:36:08PM +0200, David Paleino wrote:
> > today I received #601137 -- i.e. gThumb segfaults because of an unhandled
> > situation of a missing Exif tag (the "orientation").
> > I could track it down, and made a patch [1] for it.
> [...]
> > [1]:
> > http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/gthumb.git;a=blob;f=debian/patches/14-safe_exif_read.patch;hb=refs/heads/exp/master
> Does this mean that it still crashes if any of the other attributes are not
> present?  In the context diff it looks like there could be more.

Only the two that you can see in the diff.

> That would seem like bad design to me...

I could just check the other two too.
However, I assume that at least image width and height are set by any camera --
that's why I didn't add the check to those as well, in first place. However,
it's just an assumption, and I haven't googled for it.
Also, for those attributes there's no reasonable default that could be set.


 . ''`.   Debian developer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino
 : :'  : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/
 `. `'`  GPG: 1392B174 ----|---- http://deb.li/dapal
   `-   2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: