[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#601156: marked as done (unblock: lwjgl/2.5+dfsg-3)



Your message dated Sat, 23 Oct 2010 23:15:04 +0200
with message-id <20101023211504.GA27219@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#601156: unblock: lwjgl/2.5+dfsg-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #601156,
regarding unblock: lwjgl/2.5+dfsg-3
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
601156: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=601156
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package lwjgl

 lwjgl (2.5+dfsg-3) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * debian/rules: Update JAVA_HOME to match openjdk-6-jdk
     build-dependency. (Closes: #599988)

unblock lwjgl/2.5+dfsg-3



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On  0, Tim Retout <diocles@debian.org> wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
> 
> Please unblock package lwjgl
> 
>  lwjgl (2.5+dfsg-3) unstable; urgency=low
>  .
>    * debian/rules: Update JAVA_HOME to match openjdk-6-jdk
>      build-dependency. (Closes: #599988)
> 
> unblock lwjgl/2.5+dfsg-3
> 

Unblocked.

Regards,

-- 
Mehdi Dogguy


--- End Message ---

Reply to: