[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#598835: unblock: mina2/2.0.0+dfsg-1

On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 16:40 +0200, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote:
> On Tue, 05 Oct 2010 21:31:41 +0100, "Adam D. Barratt"
> > Even ignoring those, the diffstat against the RC1 package is
> >  136 files changed, 3004 insertions(+), 1713 deletions(-)
> > which is still quite large for an update at this stage of the freeze.
> Yes, I know :/
> RC1 was released before 2009-10-20 and upstream haven't made any release
> since then...
> So 2.0.0 final release include many bugfixes (ie. one year of bugfixes
> :/).

I've now had chance to review the diff; apologies for the delay.  It
turns out that a lot of the changes are JavaDoc or the reformatting of
method headers or calls, although the latter particularly didn't help
make the diff more readable. :-/

Having looked through the list of upstream bugfixes, I'd be happy to
unblock those, but:

> >>    * Enable rxtx support:
> >>      - d/control: Add Build-Depends on librxtx-java.
> > Why was this support not enabled earlier?  New dependencies and features
> > aren't really appropriate at this stage.
> rxtx feature was not really stable in mina RC1 release, so it was
> disabled.
> I've re-enabled it for 2.0 as I've successfully tested it locally.
> If this is too much for squeeze, I can disable this rxtx support again as
> reverse-depends of mina2 doesn't use this feature.

Sorry, but yes, if the feature hasn't been enabled previously and isn't
used by any of the r-deps, I'd prefer that it stay disabled for Squeeze.



Reply to: