Bug#600998: marked as done (unblock: proftpd-dfsg/1.3.3a-4)
Your message dated Fri, 22 Oct 2010 12:43:58 +0100
with message-id <1287747838.16686.4676.camel@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#600998: unblock: proftpd-dfsg/1.3.3a-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #600998,
regarding unblock: proftpd-dfsg/1.3.3a-4
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
600998: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=600998
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Please unblock package proftpd-dfsg ASAP:
This version fixes a security issue, as detailed in
http://bugs.proftpd.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3519
unblock proftpd-dfsg/1.3.3a-4
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=it_IT.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=it_IT.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Fri, 2010-10-22 at 12:32 +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
> Please unblock package proftpd-dfsg ASAP:
>
> This version fixes a security issue, as detailed in
> http://bugs.proftpd.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3519
A security issue in a module which isn't enabled by default, which
requires non-default configuration; unblocked, in any case.
(It would be nice if people didn't decide to mix code tidying in with
security changes. Of the nine deletions and 14 insertions in the first
hunk, three add a comment and one is the actual security fix; the other
19 appear to be renaming a variable and adding braces around the body of
a 1-line if :-/)
Regards,
Adam
--- End Message ---
Reply to: